Pause. Rewind. What? Congressman Suggests Pakistan Better Off Without Baluchistan

By Amina Elahi on February 23rd, 2012 6 Comments

Tagged: , ,

The flag of Baluchistan. (Photo: Belochistan)

The flag of Baluchistan. (Photo: Belochistan)

When you are the United States and your ties with one of the world’s most ready-to-explode nations are tenuous at best, the last thing you want is for one of your congressmen to suggest hacking the country to pieces is a good idea. Yet that’s exactly what happened Friday when California Republican Rep. Dana Rohrabacher suggested Baluchistan be set free from the wringing grasp of Pakistan’s government to exist independently.

Rohrabacher introduced a nonbinding resolution that romantically stated Baluchistan should “have the right to self-determination and to their own sovereign country,” according to the New York Times. You might think, Hey, how thoughtful. This man wants to free a province and allow it to exist on its own two feet, with no federal assistance whatesoever. How very Republican of him.

But the problem is this proposed bill, which has caused quite the brouhaha in Pakistan, has nothing to do with whether Baluchistan deserves to be an independent, or even whether it should be. Instead, it speaks to the ignorance with which American politicians approach the variety of regional and cultural issues that plague Pakistan–true–but that also make it what it is. What if we treated our states this way, cutting them off when they experienced major problems that were bringing the country down?

California’s pretty but 23 percent of its population is illiterate, so let’s give it the axe. And Texas keeps letting those pesky Mexicans in. It’s got to go too. Florida and Nevada have some of the highest foreclosure rates in the country. Why do people buy homes if they’re not going to pay for them? Those two are definitely out.

In Pakistan as in other countries around the world, there are some regions that are healthier than others. Certainly, many of Pakistan’s problems place it lower on the functionality scale that any region in the U.S., but that does not mean the solution is to dismember it into smaller nation-states. Yes, Baluchistan is a huge province and, yes, the roots of separatist insurgency lay deep there. But Pakistan already hates its relationship with the U.S.; do not give it more reasons to avoid a diplomatic rekindling.

Rep. Dana Rohrabacher, for suggesting that the best way to deal with a problem is to excise it, and for failing to understand what a suggestion might imply to Pakistan about America’s view of its sovereignty, you are:

Brownlisted.

Amina Elahi is Divanee.com’s Managing Editor. Check out her blog, where she posts words and images that make her think.

  • Aamna

    BROWNLISTED! yes! what an arrogant comment by the Rep. and thank you for setting him straight!

  • Qascade

    Its a propaganda ploy; NYT opinion columns have been suggesting this for the last few years..doing the bidding for some one else.

  • Anonymous

    Congressman Dana Rohrbacher has shown surprising sympathy with an oppressed people. If Americans knew how the Pakistanis were abducting, raping, killing Baluchis, one would expect it would make American blood boil! But instead Americans are happy to be cozy with terrorist Pakistanis who were happy to host Osama bin Laden and let thousands of American soldiers die while searching for him in Afghanistan!

  • Aamna

    @RajTOO, oh interesting…I wasn’t aware. I’d really like to learn more about his track record for sympathy with an oppressed people. Could you please share?

    BUT, I think you are being quite hateful and unfair in generalizing that all Pakistanis are terrorists…and that all Pakistanis knew the whereabouts of OBL. There’s a (HUGE) difference between corrupt government officials of Pakistan and the general public of Pakistan.

  • http://twitter.com/FaizMBaluch فيض اِم بلوچ

    The waving flag of Baluchistan itself is a big proof that Baloch were a sovereign nation. The four US congressmen showed their sympathy with oppressed Baloch nation and rightly said that Baluchistan is an occupied territory that is why it must be independent. Nobody is suggesting to cut a piece of Pakistan, but it is a historical fact that Baluchistan has never been a part of Pakistan. Baloch never opted to join Pakistan, their country was occupied at gunpoint without the will of the people of Baluchistan. We appreciate and support the stance of the FOUR US congressmen and urge other lawmakers of US to rally behind Dana Rohrabacher and become a voice for the voiceless people of occupied Balochistan.

    To the writer, how would you feel if another country occupies you great country (US) and dilute your language, culture and traditions. treats you like a colonised nation?

  • http://twitter.com/Niaz_betab Niaz Betab

    To me, Madam Amna, you’re far away being deprived of practical approach and regional knowledge, you digressed what you were up to. your write up is not an explanation but a subjective opinion.